🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

For example, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach and then fire them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.